Daniel Evans vs Cheng-Peng Hsieh Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Evans vs Hsieh analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Evans vs Cheng-Peng Hsieh Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Evans 0 - 0 Hsieh
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Evans has won 50.68% of points on their second serve, while Hsieh has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Evans, in recent form, has won 50.2% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hsieh has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.03% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Evans has saved 59.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hsieh has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Evans has won 37.21% of matches played (W/L 16/ 27), with Hsieh winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Evans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 164/ 98), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 47/ 55). Hsieh has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Evans has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 27.78% of matches (W/L 5/ 13), where as Hsieh has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Evans has played against opponents with an average rank of 171.74 while Hsieh has played against players with an average rank of 857.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Evans has won 35% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hsieh has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Evans has converted 29.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hsieh has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
59
Rank
21
High
34
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
32
Age
L
Plays
Form
60% (555-377)
Career Total W/L
35% (39-72)
32% (8-17)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,736,130
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
![banner](https://matchstat.com/assets/images/matchstat-banner.webp)
The Best Odds For Daniel Evans vs Cheng-Peng Hsieh For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Evans VS Hsieh
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Daniel Evans | Cheng-Peng Hsieh |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 32% (8/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 41% (26/38) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (302/342) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.34 | 0 |
Aces Total | 107 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
DFs Total | 87 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 2:10:36 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 197.72 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 56% (1153/2041) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 73% (837/1153) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 51% (450/888) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 30% (49/164) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (725/2077) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 20% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 36% (8/22) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 29% (4/14) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 25% (3/12) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 54% (13/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 38% (13/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Evans Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
19 of
22)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
57
|
4-6 6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Charles Broom
Player
Daniel Evans
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
13
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Evans
Player
Henry Searle
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
43 of
55)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Evans
Player
Dominic Stricker
53%
(
52 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
4
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
4
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
37 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Zachary Svajda
Player
Daniel Evans
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
104)
14
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Evans
Player
Adam Walton
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
108)
12
Aces
16
4
Double Faults
1
93%
(
53 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
58 of
76)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
22 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
33 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Holger Rune
Player
Daniel Evans
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
49%
(
49 of
101)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Daniel Evans
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
53%
(
60 of
114)
20
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
114)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Juncheng Shang
Player
Daniel Evans
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Evans
Player
Harold Mayot
49%
(
33 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
Cheng-Peng Hsieh Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Markos Kalovelonis
Player
Cheng-Peng Hsieh
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-5 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 3-2 ret. | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tsung-Hua Yang
Player
Cheng-Peng Hsieh
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Cheng-Peng Hsieh
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
31%
(
11 of
35)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
100%
(
23 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Makoto Ochi
Player
Cheng-Peng Hsieh
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
73 of
111)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
32 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
111)
108
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Cheng-Peng Hsieh
Player
Blake Ellis
49%
(
52 of
106)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
7
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
0
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
46 of
57)
70%
(
38 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
30 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
27 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Brydan Klein
Player
Cheng-Peng Hsieh
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
5
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Evans Vs Hsieh Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Evans are available here and Hsieh photos here.
![Evans Hsieh H2h Summary Stats 23rd June 2024 Evans Hsieh H2h Summary Stats 23rd June 2024](https://matchstat.com/captures/ms/atp/Daniel-Evans-Cheng-Peng-Hsieh-h2h-profile.webp)
![Daniel Evans Cheng-Peng Hsieh Prediction Stats Daniel Evans Cheng-Peng Hsieh Prediction Stats](https://matchstat.com/captures/ms/atp/Daniel-Evans-Cheng-Peng-Hsieh-h2h-stats.webp)